Cases 11 - 20 of 11,505
LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC. v. ASUSTEK COMPUTER INC. et al
as 1:2024mc00049
Petitioner:
LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC.
Respondent:
ASUSTEK COMPUTER INC. and ASUS COMPUTER INTERNATIONAL
LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC. v. ASUSTEK COMPUTER INC. et al
as 1:2024mc00050
Petitioner:
LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC.
Respondent:
ASUSTEK COMPUTER INC. and ASUS COMPUTER INTERNATIONAL
Red Lake Band of Chippewa Indians v. HHS, et al
as 24-5098
Plaintiff:
Red Lake Band of Chippewa Indians, A federally recognized Indian Tribe
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services and Xavier Becerra, in his official capacity as Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Walter Allen v. Municipal Credit Union
as 24-7054
Plaintiff:
Walter L. Allen
Defendant:
Municipal Credit Union, M.C.U.
Walter Allen v. Office of Professional Discipline
as 24-7056
Plaintiff:
Walter L. Allen
Defendant:
Office of Professional Discipline
MAODI et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2024cv01146
Plaintiff:
SHIMON MAODI, TAMAR MAODI, SHANI ROSENBERG and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
ZHONG et al v. JADDOU et al
as 1:2024cv01136
Petitioner:
FEIFEI ZHONG and YILIAN LI
Respondent:
UR M. JADDOU, CORLISS A JOSEPHS-CONWAY and MERRICK B. GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
IN RE MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE WITH SUBPOENA
as 1:2024mc00048
Not Yet Classified:
MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE WITH SUBPOENA
Petitioner:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Respondent:
TARGETSMART COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
APPLICATION OF USA PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3512 FOR ORDER FOR COMMISSIONER'S APPOINTMENT FOR FRAUD INVESTIGATION
as 1:2024ml00837
Not Yet Classified:
APPLICATION OF USA PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3512 FOR ORDER FOR COMMISSIONER'S APPOINTMENT FOR FRAUD INVESTIGATION
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
