Cases 21 - 30 of 2,492
NOT USED v. NOT USED
as 2:2024cv00396
Plaintiff:
Doe
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Trustees of the Mid-Atlantic Regional Council of Carpenters Pension Fund et al. v. Quality Logistics & Installation
as 2:2024ms00009
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Mid-Atlantic Regional Council of Carpenters Pension Fund et al.
Defendant:
Quality Logistics & Installation
Swint v. Central Intelligence Agency
as 2:2024cv00339
Plaintiff:
Robert James Swint
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency
Mayweather Promotions LLC v. PAC Entertainment Worldwide LLC et al
as 2:2024ms00008
Plaintiff:
Mayweather Promotions LLC
Defendant:
PAC Entertainment Worldwide LLC
Counter Defendant:
Mayweather Promotions, LLC
Cross Defendant:
Floyd Mayweather
Interested Party:
Jeffrey Morse & Associates, LTD
Mayweather Promotions LLC v. PAC Entertainment Worldwide LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00343
Plaintiff:
Mayweather Promotions LLC
Defendant:
PAC Entertainment Worldwide LLC
Counter Defendant:
Mayweather Promotions, LLC
Cross Defendant:
Floyd Mayweather
Interested Party:
Jeffrey Morse & Associates, LTD
Conger v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
James Conger
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Valentini et al v. Reading International, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
Daniel Valentini and Dallace Butler
Defendant:
Reading International, Inc.
Bellas v. Kahn et al
as 2:2024cv00245
Plaintiff:
Reatha Bellas
Defendant:
Robert Kahn, Randy Santa, North American Financial Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Adams v. Garci
as 2:2024cv00282
Plaintiff:
Brandon Adams
Defendant:
Anna Marie Garci
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Singleton v. Abram
as 2:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
Paul Singleton
Defendant:
Precious Abram
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
