Cases 111 - 120 of 2,017
LNU et al v. Brown
as 2:2022cv00251
Plaintiff:
Casseopeia LNU, Jane LNU, Erika LNU and others
Defendant:
Benjamin Deputy Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Enforcement of Judgment
Speed of Light Ops v. Elliot et al
as 2:2022cv00246
Plaintiff:
Speed of Light Ops
Defendant:
Gregory Alexander Elliot, John Herrington and Jessie Reese
Crestmark v. Silver Birch Systems et al
as 2:2022mc00229
Plaintiff:
Crestmark
Defendant:
Silver Birch Systems and Daniel T. Oshatz
Receiver:
Scott Eisenberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754 Receiver of Property in Different Districts
Anderson v. Anderson et al
as 2:2022cv00206
Plaintiff:
Chris B. Anderson
Defendant:
Laura S. Anderson, Supreme Sales Service and Training and Rasmussen & Associates
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7434 IRS: Civil Damages for Fraudulent Filing of Information
XMission v. Results Ink
as 2:2022cv00209
Plaintiff:
XMission
Defendant:
Results Ink, Adonis Lifestyles and Brad Howard
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 7701 Federal CAN-Spam Act
XMission v. Conversionology Media
as 2:2022cv00210
Plaintiff:
XMission
Defendant:
Conversionology Media
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 7701 Federal CAN-Spam Act
Mission Healthcare Services et al v. Renew Home Health et al
as 2:2022cv00205
Plaintiff:
Mission Healthcare Services and Unified Health Services
Defendant:
Renew Home Health, Jeffrey Stacy, Jennifer Tavares and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
XMission v. Modaramo Media
as 2:2022cv00199
Plaintiff:
XMission
Defendant:
Modaramo Media
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 7701 Federal CAN-Spam Act
Dade v. Peters et al
as 2:2022mc00213
Petitioner:
John Ernest Dade
Respondent:
James Peters and E. Lehorl
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Five Points Management Group v. Campaign et al
as 2:2022mc00158
Plaintiff:
Five Points Management Group
Defendant:
Campaign and Bradley Sewell
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
