Cases 61 - 70 of 81
HANSON et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2009cv00454
Plaintiff:
TRACEY AMBEAU HANSON, GILLIAN ST. LAWRENCE, PAUL ST. LAWRENCE and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and CATHY LANIER
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MAY v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 1:2007cv02203
Plaintiff:
GEORGE MAY
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA, CHARLIE CRIST, KAREN MARJORIE MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
MAY v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 1:2007cv02096
Plaintiff:
GEORGE MAY
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA, RIC L. BRADSHAW, ELIZABETH T. MAASS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LEONARD v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2007cv02052
Plaintiff:
GREGORY W. LEONARD
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
ROSE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2007cv00926
Plaintiff:
PETER ROSE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
MAJEED et al v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2007cv00222
Plaintiff:
BURNIE MAJEED, SR., BURNIE MAJEED, JR. and KENYA MAJEED
Defendant:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, NC ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF THE COURT, UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
CAPITOL PAVING OF D.C., INC. v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2007cv00113
Plaintiff:
CAPITOL PAVING OF D.C., INC.
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and ADRIAN M. FENTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
CLEMMONS' ESTATE v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 1:2006cv01657
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DYE et al v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2006cv01372
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
