Cases 51 - 60 of 20,621
IN RE SUBPOENA TO NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
as 1:2024mc00059
Not Yet Classified:
SUBPOENA TO NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
Petitioner:
NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
Respondent:
CAMP LEJEUNE WATER LITIGATION
CAHILL v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
as 1:2024cv01351
Plaintiff:
BRET EDWARD CAHILL
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
INFORMED CONSENT ACTION NETWORK v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024cv01348
Plaintiff:
INFORMED CONSENT ACTION NETWORK
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY v. U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE et al
as 1:2024cv01328
Plaintiff:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Defendant:
U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE and MARTHA WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1540 Endangered Species Act
MARONI et al v. MAYORKAS et al
as 1:2024cv01334
Plaintiff:
HANRI MARCELL SURIAN MARONI, CLAUDIA REGINA CINTI CORREA PORTO, MARCIO CAMPOS CHOUIN VAREJAO and others
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR MENDOZA JADDOU and CONNIE NOLAN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
NELSON'S CABINETRY, INC. et al v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2024cv01335
Plaintiff:
NELSON'S CABINETRY, INC., CARLOS EDUARDO PIMENTEL, KAREN GASPARETTO PIMENTEL and others
Defendant:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, MERRICK GARLAND and JACQUELINE WARD
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
CENTER FOR IMMIGRATION STUDIES v. U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION
as 1:2024cv01315
Plaintiff:
CENTER FOR IMMIGRATION STUDIES
Defendant:
U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
CENTER TO ADVANCE SECURITY IN AMERICA v. U.S. ARMY
as 1:2024cv01323
Plaintiff:
CENTER TO ADVANCE SECURITY IN AMERICA
Defendant:
U.S. ARMY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
