Cases 91 - 100 of 398
Warrenfeltz v. Hogan Assessment Systems, Inc.
as 4:2017cv00428
Plaintiff:
Rodney Warrenfeltz
Defendant:
Hogan Assessment Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Machion v. DigitalGlobe, Inc et al
as 1:2017cv01692
Plaintiff:
Matthew Machion
Defendant:
DigitalGlobe, Inc , MacDonald, Dettwiler and Associates, Ltd., Jeffrey R. Tarr and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
machion v. DigitalGlobe, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01691
Plaintiff:
matthew machion
Defendant:
DigitalGlobe, Inc., MacDonald, Dettwiler and Associates, Ltd., General Howell M. Estes, III and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Inforzato v. Jensen et al
as 2:2017cv00317
Plaintiff:
Michael Inforzato
Defendant:
Darren Jensen, David S. Manovich, Dave Toole and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078
Macalinao v. Atwood et al
as 1:2017cv00743
Plaintiff:
Juzet Macalinao
Defendant:
Brian G. Atwood, M. James Barrett, James C. Blair and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Guo v. Mahaffy et al
as 1:2017cv00706
Plaintiff:
Wenduo Guo
Defendant:
Patrick J. Mahaffy, Daniel W. Muehl, Gillian C. Ivers-Read and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rumbaugh v. USANA Health Sciences et al
as 2:2017cv00106
Plaintiff:
April Rumbaugh
Defendant:
USANA Health Sciences, David A. Wentz and Paul A. Jones
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Kim v. BATS Global Markets, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv02817
Plaintiff:
Seung Kim
Defendant:
BATS Global Markets, Inc., Chris Concannon, Joseph Ratterman and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Olagues v. Lawler et al
as 5:2016cv01391
Plaintiff:
John Olagues
Defendant:
Robert Lawler, Jason Pigott, John Kapchinske and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Peter J. Babich Estate et al v. Odegard et al
as 1:2016cv02873
Plaintiff:
Linda M. Redinger , Peter J. Babich Estate , Peter J. Babich Trust and others
Defendant:
Michael A. Odegard and Odegard Energy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1821 Default of Loan by Promissary Note
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
