Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Day et al v. Natabraham LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00909
Plaintiff:
John Day and Wendy Vargas
Defendant:
Natabraham LLC, Duneski Gonzales, Carlos Perez Correa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Wrongful Death
Bell et al v. Griswold et al
as 2:2023cv02068
Plaintiff:
Kathlene Bell and Michael Bell
Defendant:
Ashley L Griswold, Werner Enterprises, Inc. and Ashley L. Griswold
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Bell v. Bedford Transportation, LTD et al
as 6:2021cv01007
Plaintiff:
DeCarlo Bell
Defendant:
Bedford Industries, Inc., Stephen Wesley Gaskins, II and Bedford Transportation, LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Seman v. Illahi et al
as 1:2020cv00017
Defendant:
Danilo Illahi and Western Sales Trading Company
Plaintiff:
Isa Belle Palacios Seman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bell v. USA
as 1:2020cv00031
Plaintiff:
Barbara Bell
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Stiner v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Company
as 2:2019cv02152
Defendant:
Southwestern Bell Telephone Company and Southwestern Bell Telephone Company a foreign corporation doing business as AT&T KS
Plaintiff:
Robert Stiner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bell v. Tatom et al
as 1:2015cv00102
Plaintiff:
Michelle Bell
Defendant:
Pamela W. Tatom and Hershey Company, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hill v. USA et al
as 1:2011cv02296
Plaintiff:
Michelle Hill
Defendant:
USA, Blake (I) Bell and Blake Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Bell v. Aceves-Gutierrez
as 1:2010cv03081
Plaintiff:
Terry Bell
Defendant:
Melody Aceves-Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Bell et al v. Estate of Victor Hancock et al
as 1:2010cv01080
Plaintiff:
Shirley Bell , Latasha Riddle and Richard L. Bell
Defendant:
Estate of Victor Hancock and Cowpoke Feeds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
