Cases 11 - 20 of 2,114
Miska v. Walmart, Inc.
as 1:2024cv01555
Plaintiff:
Bobby Miska
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Fields et al v. Nestle Purina Pet Care Co.
as 1:2024cv01500
Plaintiff:
Robert Fields and Lorena Ortiz
Defendant:
Nestle Purina Pet Care Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0051 - Personal Injury
Williams v. Dillon Companies, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01490
Plaintiff:
Margaret Williams
Defendant:
Dillon Companies, LLC f/k/a Dillon Companies, Inc. d/b/a King Soopers and The Kroger Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Torres v. Lyft, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01465
Plaintiff:
JASMINE TORRES
Defendant:
LYFT, INC. and TEMITOPE GABRIEL AHEREBE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ruiz et al v. Bromley
as 1:2024cv01450
Plaintiff:
Hilda Ruiz and Renee Leon-Mendoza
Defendant:
Miranda Bromley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Noguera v. United Airlines Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01449
Plaintiff:
Olga Noguera
Defendant:
United Airlines Inc. and G2 Secure Staff, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Wohlfeiler v. Little Man Ice Cream, LLC
as 1:2024cv01432
Plaintiff:
Vicki Wohlfeiler
Defendant:
Little Man Ice Cream, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Foreman v. Dillon Companies, LLC
as 1:2024cv01430
Plaintiff:
Mary Theresa Foreman
Defendant:
Dillon Companies, LLC a Kansas limited liability company doing business as King Soopers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Gallegos v. DG Retail, LLC
as 1:2024cv01389
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Gallegos
Defendant:
DG Retail, LLC a foreign entity doing business as Dollar General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Robinson-Barco v. Proft
as 1:2024cv01392
Plaintiff:
Ravyn Robinson-Barco
Defendant:
Nathaniel Proft
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
