Cases 31 - 40 of 79
Perry v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2012cv00766
Plaintiff:
Sheila Perry
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Register v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2012cv00767
Plaintiff:
Lillian Register
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Avila v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2012cv00760
Plaintiff:
Sheri Avila
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kidwell v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2012cv00763
Plaintiff:
Mary Kidwell
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Deloach v. Wal Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00749
Plaintiff:
John Deloach
Defendant:
Wal Mart Stores, Inc. and McIlhenny Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gutierrez et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00332
Plaintiff:
Velia Gutierrez and David Gutierrez
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., C. R. Bard, Inc. , John Does I-X and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Padilla v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00805
Plaintiff:
Donna Padilla
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ensey v. Ozzie's Pipeline Padder, Inc.
as 1:2008cv00801
Plaintiff:
John Ensey
Defendant:
Ozzie's Pipeline Padder, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
McCurdy et al v. Costco Wholesale Corporation et al
as 1:2008cv00387
Plaintiff:
Kathy McCurdy and Don McCurdy
Defendant:
Costco Wholesale Corporation, John Doe Corporation and John Doe's 1-10
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gallegos v. Knoll, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00360
Plaintiff:
Ernest Gallegos
Defendant:
Knoll, Inc., Knoll, Inc. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
