Cases 41 - 50 of 82
McKenna v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00331
Plaintiff:
Vickie McKenna
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc., C.R. Bard, Inc., Boston Scientific Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shafer et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv02633
Plaintiff:
Terry L. Shafer and Doris Simpson
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. , Ethicon Women's Health and Urology and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Torres et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2014cv00743
Plaintiff:
Felicita Torres , Joann Stevens-Tronson , Sue Stevenson and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Ethicon, Inc. and Ethicon, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
States et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 5:2014cv00702
Plaintiff:
Michelle States and Johnnie Harper
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Anderson v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 5:2014cv00693
Plaintiff:
Teresa Marie Anderson
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Page et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 5:2014cv00699
Plaintiff:
Ilarae J Page and Cheryl McClain
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Killsfirst v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 5:2014cv00697
Plaintiff:
Inola Killsfirst
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Halliburton v. Johnson & Johnson
as 5:2014cv00696
Plaintiff:
Joy L Halliburton
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wade v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 5:2014cv00691
Plaintiff:
Diana Wade
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Teague v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 5:2014cv00701
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Teague
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
