Cases 61 - 70 of 83
Perry v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2012cv00766
Plaintiff:
Sheila Perry
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Register v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2012cv00767
Plaintiff:
Lillian Register
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Avila v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2012cv00760
Plaintiff:
Sheri Avila
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kidwell v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2012cv00763
Plaintiff:
Mary Kidwell
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shannon et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00758
Plaintiff:
Donna Shannon and Ryan Shannon
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production, S.A.S.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Novotny et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv00661
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Novotny and Jason Novotny
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation, C.R. Bard, Inc., Covidien Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bunch v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv02373
Plaintiff:
Carol E. Bunch
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Prince v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv02948
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Prince
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Benson v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv02939
Plaintiff:
Georgia Renee Benson
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc., Covidien Inc., Covidien PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Goede et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00096
Plaintiff:
Seth Goede and Kimberly Goede
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
