Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Trustees of the Pipe Industry Health and Welfare Fund of Colorado et al v. Hurst & Burr Mechanical, Inc. et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2009cv02860
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Pipe Industry Health and Welfare Fund of Colorado, Trustees of the Pipe Industry Health and Welfare Fund of Colorado, Trustees of the Colorado Pipe Industry Annuity and Salary Deferral Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
Hurst & Burr Mechanical, Inc. and First National Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
United States Department of Labor, Secretary of v. Intellisoft Corp. et al
as 2:2009cv02604
Plaintiff:
United States Department of Labor, Secretary of
Defendant:
Intellisoft Corp. and Intellisoft Corp. 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Trustees of the Pipe Industry Health and Welfare Fund of Colorado et al v. Mountain Mechanical Engineers, Inc.
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2009cv02505
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Pipe Industry Health and Welfare Fund of Colorado, Trustees of the Pipe Industry Health and Welfare Fund of Colorado, Trustees of the Denver Pipe Industry Vacation Fund and others
Defendant:
Mountain Mechanical Engineers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Trustees of the Pipe Industry Health and Wlefare Fund of Colorado et al v. Gregory Piping Systems, Inc.
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2009cv02255
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Pipe Industry Health and Wlefare Fund of Colorado, Trustees of the Pipe Industry Health and Wlefare Fund of Colorado, Trustees of the Denver Pipe Industry Vacation Fund and others
Defendant:
Gregory Piping Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Quality Control Council of The United States et al v. Jan X-Ray Services
as 2:2009cv02022
Plaintiff:
Quality Control Council of The United States, Quality Control Council of The United States, Non-Destructive Testing Communications and Productivity Fund and others
Defendant:
Jan X-Ray Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Quality Control Council of The United States et al v. Integrated Quality Services, Inc.
as 2:2008cv02530
Plaintiff:
Quality Control Council of The United States, Quality Control Council of The United States, Non-Destructive Testing Communications and Productivity Fund and others
Defendant:
Integrated Quality Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Trustees of the Pipe Industry Health and Welfare Fund of Colorado et al v. Felix Mechanical, LLC
as 1:2008cv00743
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Pipe Industry Health and Welfare Fund of Colorado, Trustees of the Pipe Industry Health and Welfare Fund of Colorado, Trustees of the Denver Pipe Industry Vacation Fund and others
Defendant:
Felix Mechanical, LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Trustees of the Pipe Industry Health and Welfare Fund of Colorado et al v. BEK Systems, Inc. et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2008cv00742
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Pipe Industry Health and Welfare Fund of Colorado, Trustees of the Pipe Industry Health and Welfare Fund of Colorado, Trustees of the Colorado Pipe Industry Annuity and Salary Deferral Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
BEK Systems, Inc. and Paul G. Englram
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Chao et al v. Professional Resources, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv02077
Plaintiff:
Elaine L. Chao and United States Department of Labor
Defendant:
Professional Resources, Inc. and Professional Resources, Inc. 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan and Trust
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.