Cases 1 - 8 of 8
S. et al v. Bluecross Blueshield of Illinois et al
as 2:2019cv00458
Plaintiff:
S. S., Donna S. and Michael S.
Defendant:
Baker Tilly Virchow Krause LLP Health Care Plan and Bluecross Blueshield of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
McDonald et al v. La Porte Construction et al
as 2:2014cv00542
Plaintiff:
Michael McDonald , George Bosil-Jevac , Mike Baker and others
Defendant:
La Porte Construction and Benjamin Logue
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
McDonald et al v. Dark Horse Steel et al
as 2:2013cv00048
Plaintiff:
Michael McDonald , George Bosiljevac , Mike Baker and others
Defendant:
Dark Horse Steel, Ascent Construction, Gear30 and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Anderson et al v. Cemex et al
as 2:2012cv00136
Plaintiff:
Kelly T. Anderson , Dean A. Bailey , Aryon E. Baker, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Cemex and Salaried Employees' Retirement Plan of Southwestern Portland Cement
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Baker et al v. Dark Horse Steel et al
as 2:2009cv00448
Plaintiff:
Mike Baker, Michael McDonald, Jerry Romero and others
Defendant:
Dark Horse Steel, Scot Evans and Jessie Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McDonald et al v. BEKO Associates et al
as 2:2008cv00328
Plaintiff:
Michael McDonald, George Bosiljevac, Mike Baker and others
Defendant:
BEKO Associates and Beatrix Koev
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McDonald et al v. Steel Ventures et al
as 2:2008cv00205
Plaintiff:
Michael McDonald, George Bosiljevac, Mike Baker and others
Defendant:
Steel Ventures and Steve Jolley
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McDonald et al v. Ravndal et al
as 2:2007cv00696
Plaintiff:
Michael McDonald, Michael McDonald, George Bosiljevac and others
Defendant:
Harold Ravndal, Tina M. Ravndal and Lorraine Van Ausdol
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
