Cases 71 - 80 of 190
Sattler v. Air Methods Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv00824
Plaintiff:
Neil Sattler
Defendant:
Air Methods Corporation , Aaron D. Todd , C. David Kikumoto and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Krueger v. ONEOK Partners, L.P. et al
as 4:2017cv00161
Plaintiff:
Juergen Krueger
Defendant:
ONEOK Partners, L.P., Terry K Spencer, John W Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Olagues v. Muncrief et al
as 4:2017cv00153
Plaintiff:
John Olagues
Defendant:
Richard E Muncrief, Dennis Cameron and WPX Energy Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Lewis v. Lipocine Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00182
Plaintiff:
David Lewis, Lipocine Investor Group and Anthony Morassi
Defendant:
Lipocine Inc. , Mahesh V. Patel and Morgan R. Brown
Movant:
Grey Burleson and John Redmond
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078
Rempel v. Stillwater Mining Company et al
as 1:2017cv00400
Plaintiff:
John Rempel
Defendant:
Stillwater Mining Company, Brian D. Schweitzer, Michael J. McMullen and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Olagues v. Tarr et al
as 1:2017cv00279
Plaintiff:
John A. Olagues
Defendant:
Jeffrey Tarr, Stephanie Comfort, Scott Walter and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Lashkari v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv03180
Plaintiff:
Cyrus Lashkari
Defendant:
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc., Steve Ells, Montgomery F. Moran and others
Interested_party:
Sean Gubricky
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Olagues et al v. Krimbill et al
as 4:2016cv00748
Plaintiff:
John A Olagues and Ray Wollney
Defendant:
Michael Krimbill, Shawn Coady, Vincent J Osterman and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
NGL Energy Partners LP v. Olagues et al
as 4:2016cv00744
Plaintiff:
NGL Energy Partners LP
Defendant:
John A Olagues and Ray Wollney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Gilhousen v. Engles et al
as 1:2016cv02057
Plaintiff:
John-Mark Gilhousen
Defendant:
Gregg L. Engles, Joseph S. Hardin, Stephen L. Green and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
