Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Neosho County, Kansas, Board of Commissioners v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 2:2018cv02497
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Endo Health Solutions, Inc., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Board of Commissioners of the County of Neosho County, Kansas and Neosho County, Kansas, Board of Commissioners
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
Weber County v. Purdue Pharma LP et al
as 1:2018cv00089
Defendant:
Actavis Incorporated, McKesson Corporation, Purdue Federick Company, The and others
Plaintiff:
Weber County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Uintah County et al v. Purdue Pharma LP et al
as 2:2018cv00585
Defendant:
Actavis Incorporated, McKesson Corporation, Purdue Federick Company, The and others
Plaintiff:
TriCounty Health Department, Uintah County, Duchesne County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Board of County Commissioners of the County of Crawford v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 2:2018cv02246
Plaintiff:
Board of County Commissioners of the County of Crawford
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma, L.P., Purdue Frederick Company, Inc., The, Purdue Pharma, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
GD Searle LLC et al v. Brigham Young University et al
as 2:2013mc00918
Plaintiff:
GD Searle LLC and Pfizer Asia Pacific PTE
Respondent:
Brigham Young University
Defendant:
Lupin Pharmaceuticals , Teva Pharmaceuticals USA , Mylan Pharmaceuticals and others
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
State of Utah v. Actvis US et al
as 2:2007cv00870
Plaintiff:
State of Utah and State of Utah
Defendant:
Actvis US, Barr Laboratories, Endo Pharmaceuticals and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
