Cases 21 - 30 of 60
Hildebrand v. Monroe Truck Equipment (MTE)
as 1:2014cv00425
Plaintiff:
David L. Hildebrand
Defendant:
Monroe Truck Equipment (MTE)
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Hildebrand v. City of Boulder
as 1:2013cv03344
Plaintiff:
David L. Hildebrand
Defendant:
City of Boulder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Hildebrand v. Boulder County
as 1:2013cv01594
Plaintiff:
David L. Hildebrand
Defendant:
Boulder County
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Hunter Douglas, Inc. et al v. Nien Made Enterprise Co. Ltd. et al
as 1:2013cv01412
Plaintiff:
Hunter Douglas, Inc. , Russell L. Hinckley, Sr. and Andrew J. Toti Testamentary Trust
Defendant:
Nien Made Enterprise Co. Ltd., Norman International, Inc., Norman International Colorado, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Adams Jr. v. Grand Slam Club/Ovis et al
as 1:2012cv02938
Plaintiff:
Charles C. Adams Jr.
Defendant:
Grand Slam Club/Ovis, Dennis Campbell and Thomas L. Miranda Jr.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Hildebrand, v. Ridgerock Tools Inc, et al.
as 1:2012cv01358
Plaintiff:
David L. Hildebrand
Defendant:
Ridgerock Tools Inc and Neiko Tools
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Salba Corp., N.A. et al v. X Factor Holdings, LLC et al
as 1:2012cv01306
Plaintiff:
Salba Corp., N.A. , Salba Smart Naturals Products , William A. Ralston and others
Defendant:
X Factor Holdings, LLC and Ancient Naturals, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Kazanchy v. Howell et al
as 1:2012cv00444
Plaintiff:
John L. Kazanchy
Defendant:
Keith M. Howell and Howell Ventures LTD
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Kazanchy v. Howell et al
as 1:2012cv00445
Plaintiff:
John L. Kazanchy
Defendant:
Keith M. Howell and Howell Ventures LTD
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Videopolis SA et al v. TripTelevision et al
as 1:2011cv02968
Plaintiff:
Videopolis SA and Videopolis France
Defendant:
TripTelevision and Kulin L. Strimbu
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
