Cases 1 - 10 of 11
HydraFacial LLC v. Luvo Medical Technologies Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00587
Defendant:
Eunsung Global Corp, Healthcare Markets Inc doing business as Powered by MRP, Luvo Medical Technologies Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Edge Systems LLC and HydraFacial LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271 Patent Infringement
Love-Less Ash et al v. Asia Pacific Construction et al
as 2:2018cv00595
Defendant:
Tool4Stone, Power and Abrasive Tools Store, Kyle Cranfill and others
Plaintiff:
Dustless Depot and Love-Less Ash
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101
Power Music v. Wonder Power Music
as 1:2018cv00009
Plaintiff:
Power Music
Defendant:
Wonder Power Music
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Derive Power et al v. EZ Lynk SEZC et al
as 2:2016cv01066
Plaintiff:
Derive Power and Derive Systems
Defendant:
EZ Lynk SEZC , H&S Performance , Thomas Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101
Power Line Industries v. Spartan Tool
as 2:2016cv00242
Plaintiff:
Power Line Industries
Defendant:
Spartan Tool
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Power Music v. Step Company, The
as 1:2015cv00065
Plaintiff:
Power Music
Defendant:
Step Company, The
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Emergency Essentials v. Shore Power
as 2:2014cv00254
Plaintiff:
Emergency Essentials
Defendant:
Shore Power
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Fluid Power Training Institute v. Intellischematic et al
as 2:2012cv00679
Plaintiff:
Fluid Power Training Institute
Defendant:
Intellischematic, Telemedia, TPC Training Systems and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0501
Meteoro Amusement v. S&S Worldwide et al
as 1:2012cv00016
Plaintiff:
Meteoro Amusement
Defendant:
S&S Worldwide and S&S Power
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271
ER Mitchell Management v. Diesel Power Source et al
as 2:2011cv00745
Plaintiff:
ER Mitchell Management
Defendant:
Diesel Power Source and Bret Parks
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
