Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Hattrup v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 5:2017cv04083
Plaintiff:
Scott Gregory Hattrup
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service, Julia Deng and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7433
Pflum v. United States of America et al
as 5:2017cv04003
Plaintiff:
David Gerard Pflum
Defendant:
United States of America , Kansas Department of Revenue, Herbert Linder and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 6502
Acheff v. Lazare et al
as 1:2012cv00100
3Rd Party Defendant:
Jon Edelman, Jon J. Edelman, John J. Edelman and others
Defendant:
Peter B Lazare, John Doe, Jon J Edelman Trust and others
Plaintiff:
William B Acheff
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ai et al v. United States of America
as 1:2011cv00014
Plaintiff:
Fang Lin Ai , Concorde Garment Manufacturing Corporation and Does 1-1000
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
Erwin v. United States of America et al
as 5:2011cv00572
Plaintiff:
Ricky A Erwin
Defendant:
United States of America, Internal Revenue Service, Jonathan B N Albarran and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
USA v. John Does
as 1:2009cv00861
Petitioner:
USA
Respondent:
John Does
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
USA v. Criner et al
as 4:2009cv00192
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Jerry D Criner, Virginia McClelland, John I - IV Does and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Citimortgage, Inc. v. Thrasher et al
as 1:2008cv00648
Plaintiff:
Citimortgage, Inc. and Citimortgage, Inc.
Defendant:
Jack D. Thrasher, Diane L. Thrasher, Shirley Joan Meyer and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Williamson, et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2007cv00552
Plaintiff:
John S Williamson, Nancy L Williamson and John Does
Defendant:
John Does and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
