Cases 11 - 20 of 45
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02615
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Ad Astra Recovery Services, Inc. v. Heath et al
as 6:2018cv01145
Plaintiff:
Ad Astra Recovery Services, Inc.
Defendant:
John Clifford Heath, John C. Heath, Attorney at Law, PLLC, Progrexion Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02652
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Nolan-Bey v. McPherson County Court et al
as 6:2017cv01278
Plaintiff:
Marques Nolan-Bey
Defendant:
McPherson County Court, Richard B. Walker, David Page and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fuller v. Olathe Police Department et al
as 2:2017cv02580
Plaintiff:
Harold Glen Fuller
Defendant:
Olathe Police Department, INS Corporation, Scott Harvey Real Estate Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brave Law Firm, LLC v. Truck Accident Lawyers Group, Inc. et al
as 6:2017cv01156
Defendant:
Truck Accident Lawyers Group, Inc., Brad Pistotnik Law, P.A., Affiliated Attorneys of Pistotnik Law Offices, P.A. and others
Plaintiff:
Brave Law Firm, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Federal Trade Commission v. AMG Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2017mc00208
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
AMG Services, Inc., Red Cedar Services, Inc., SFS, Inc. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02776
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02761
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
