Cases 1 - 10 of 10
iFreedom Direct v. Lehman Brothers Holdings
as 2:2015cv00877
Plaintiff:
iFreedom Direct
Defendant:
Lehman Brothers Holdings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
iFreedom Direct v. Lehman Brothers Holdings
as 2:2015cv00872
Plaintiff:
iFreedom Direct
Defendant:
Lehman Brothers Holdings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
iFreedom Direct v. Lehman Brothers Holdings
as 2:2015cv00878
Plaintiff:
iFreedom Direct
Defendant:
Lehman Brothers Holdings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
iFreedom Direct v. Lehman Brothers Holdings
as 2:2015cv00868
Plaintiff:
iFreedom Direct
Defendant:
Lehman Brothers Holdings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Ifreedom Direct v. Lehman Brothers Holdings
as 2:2015cv00869
Plaintiff:
Ifreedom Direct
Defendant:
Lehman Brothers Holdings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rawson et al v. Seterus et al
as 2:2011cv00928
Plaintiff:
Bret W. Rawson and Jennifer A. Rawson
Defendant:
Seterus , Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems , Lehman Brothers Bank FSB and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anderson et al v. Lehman Brothers Bank FSB et al
as 2:2011cv00584
Plaintiff:
Wayne Anderson and Kimberly Anderson
Defendant:
Lehman Brothers Bank FSB , Aurora Loan Services , James H. Woodall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Estrada v. Aurora Loan Services et al
as 2:2010cv01009
Plaintiff:
Lucio Estrada
Defendant:
Aurora Loan Services and Lehman Brother Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Harris v. Lehman Brothers Bank et al
as 2:2010cv00690
Plaintiff:
Richard W. Harris
Defendant:
Lehman Brothers Bank , Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems , ITS Title Insurance Services and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Christofferson v. Aurora Loan Services et al
as 2:2008cv00663
Plaintiff:
Bart N. Christofferson
Defendant:
Aurora Loan Services, Aurora Loan Services, Cal Western Reconveyance and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
