Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Peters et al v. Biomet Orthopedics et al
as 2:2012cv00948
Plaintiff:
Suzanne K. Peters and Steven Peters
Defendant:
Biomet Orthopedics and Biomet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Johnson et al v. Boston Scientific
as 2:2012cv00655
Plaintiff:
Misty Johnson and Brandon K. Johnson
Defendant:
Boston Scientific
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gray et al v. American Medical Systems et al
as 2:2012cv00635
Plaintiff:
Sue K. Gray and Gary E. Gray
Defendant:
American Medical Systems and Endo Pharmaceuticals Holdings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FIG et al v. Sachs et al
as 2:2012cv00524
Plaintiff:
FIG , Joseph E. Tesch and Carol K. Tesch
Defendant:
David Sachs, Andrew Montgomery and Don Rudy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hogan v. Winder et al
as 2:2012cv00123
Plaintiff:
Chris Hogan
Defendant:
Michael K. Winder , West Valley City , Kevan Barney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mehl v. Allstate Insurance
as 1:2012cv00011
Plaintiff:
Deborah K. Mehl
Defendant:
Allstate Insurance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hoagland et al v. Rockin' R Ranch & Lodge Guest Operations et al
as 2:2010cv00478
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Ann Hoagland , Erika Hoagland and Karen Hoagland
Defendant:
Rockin' R Ranch & Lodge Guest Operations, Burns K. Black, X Investments and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gurney et al v. Yamaha Motor Company, Ltd. et al
as 2:2009cv00103
Plaintiff:
Alan K. Gurney and Vicki W. Gurney
Defendant:
Yamaha Motor Company, Ltd., Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A. and Yamaha Motor Manufacturing Corporation of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Clayton v. Bate et al
as 2:2009cv00025
Plaintiff:
Harlan K. Clayton
Defendant:
Leaira H. Bate and Thora Maryann Bate
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Ito v. Merck & Company, Inc.
as 2:2008cv00739
Plaintiff:
Robert K. Ito and Robert K. Ito
Defendant:
Merck & Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
