Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Roosevelt County v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2018cv00795
Defendant:
Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P., McKesson Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
The County of Mora v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2017cv01044
Plaintiff:
The County of Mora
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma L.P. , Purdue Pharma Inc. , The Purdue Frederick Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lee v. Merck & Co Inc et al
as 5:2013cv00346
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee
Defendant:
Merck & Co Inc, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp, McKesson Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Deibert v. Merck & Co Inc et al
as 5:2013cv00347
Plaintiff:
Michael Deibert
Defendant:
Merck & Co Inc, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp, McKesson Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ervin v. Actavis, Inc. et al
as 6:2010cv01153
Plaintiff:
Diane A. Ervin
Defendant:
Actavis, Inc., Actavis Totowa, LLC, Mylan, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
O'Brien et al v. Actavis Totowa LLC et al
as 5:2010cv00460
Plaintiff:
Forrest O'Brien
Defendant:
Actavis Totowa LLC , Actavis Inc , Actavis Elizabeth Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kerstann et al v. Actavis Totowa, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv02201
Plaintiff:
William Kerstann and Susan Duffy
Defendant:
Actavis Totowa, LLC, Actavis Inc., Actavis Elizabeth, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Konek v. Actavis, Inc. et al
as 6:2008cv01145
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Konek and Peter J. Konek
Defendant:
Actavis, Inc., Actavis Totowa, LLC, Mylan, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Schrock et al v. Wyeth Inc et al
as 5:2008cv00453
Plaintiff:
Susan Schrock and Steve Schrock
Defendant:
Wyeth Inc, Schwarz Pharma Inc, Pliva USA Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
