Cases 41 - 50 of 81
Haynes v. Merck & Co. Inc.
as 1:2013cv00191
Plaintiff:
TC Haynes
Defendant:
Merck, Sharpe & Dohme, Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cooley v. Organon USA, Inc. et al
as 6:2013cv01034
Plaintiff:
Emma M. Cooley
Defendant:
Organon USA, Inc. , N.V. Organon , Schering Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Reddix v. Organon USA Inc et al
as 5:2013cv00018
Plaintiff:
Tammy Reddix
Defendant:
Organon USA Inc , NV Organon , Schering Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jeffery v. Merck & Co et al
as 2:2012cv00961
Plaintiff:
Joy Jeffery
Defendant:
Merck & Co, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Teva Pharmaceuticals USA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Evans v. Merck & Co et al
as 2:2012cv00960
Plaintiff:
Jerry Evans
Defendant:
Merck & Co, Merck Sharp & Dohme and Warner Chilcott (US)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Martin v. Merck & Co et al
as 2:2012cv00958
Plaintiff:
Marina Martin
Defendant:
Merck & Co and Merck Sharp & Dohme
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Elison v. Merck & Co et al
as 2:2012cv00956
Plaintiff:
Linda Elison
Defendant:
Merck & Co, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Warner Chilcott (US) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Vertuccio v. Merck & Co et al
as 1:2012cv00216
Plaintiff:
Lana Vertuccio
Defendant:
Merck & Co and Merck Sharp & Dohme
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stevenson v. Merck & Co et al
as 2:2012cv00943
Plaintiff:
Nada Stevenson
Defendant:
Merck & Co and Merck Sharp & Dohme
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Oveson v. Merck & Co et al
as 2:2012cv00942
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Oveson
Defendant:
Merck & Co and Merck Sharp & Dohme
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
