Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Bloom v. Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00840
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Bloom
Defendant:
Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hoobler v. Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc.
as 2:2023cv02055
Plaintiff:
Evan Hoobler
Defendant:
Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Geraci v. Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc.
as 2:2023cv02066
Plaintiff:
Ronald Nicholas Geraci and Nick Geraci
Defendant:
Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Cox et al v. Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc.
as 2:2021cv00437
Plaintiff:
Michael Warren Cox and Penny Ray Cox
Defendant:
Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Grubb v. Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc.
as 1:2020cv00687
Plaintiff:
Robyn Grubb
Defendant:
Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc. and Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc. doing business as Harbor Freight Tools
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rodriguez v. Harbor Freight Tools USA Inc et al
as 1:2018cv00699
Defendant:
John Doe, Home Depot USA, Inc., Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wade v. Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc.
as 1:2016cv02276
Plaintiff:
Jason Wade
Defendant:
Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kolakowski v. Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv02682
Plaintiff:
Mark Kolakowski
Defendant:
Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Needham v. Harbor Freight Tools USA Inc
as 5:2011cv00604
Plaintiff:
Peter A Needham, Sr
Defendant:
Harbor Freight Tools USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hesketh v. Harbor Freight Tools USA Inc
as 5:2009cv00233
Plaintiff:
James Hesketh
Defendant:
Harbor Freight Tools USA Inc
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
