Cases 1 - 10 of 409
City v. Salazar et al
as 1:2024cv01881
Plaintiff:
Leo City
Defendant:
DoorDash, Inc. and Richard Salazar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Loudermill v. Brattin
as 2:2024cv02126
Plaintiff:
Denton Eugene Loudermill, Jr.
Defendant:
Richard Ray Brattin, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Broezell v. National Park Service et al
as 1:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Richard Broezell
Defendant:
National Park Service and National Park Service Park Ranger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364 Auto Negligence
Haviar v. Singh et al
as 1:2024cv00607
Plaintiff:
Richard Haviar
Defendant:
Amrit Singh and Badla Trucking Lines, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Moore v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
Richard C Moore
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Williams v. Gage et al
as 1:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Wendy R Williams
Defendant:
Richard Gage and Richard Gage PC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Rea v. Raft Enterprises Inc
as 2:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Ronald J Rea
Defendant:
Raft Enterprises, Inc., Richard Abbott and Raft Enterprises Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Willis v. Aladdin Transportation Inc et al
as 5:2023cv00945
Plaintiff:
Louis Jacob Willis
Defendant:
Aladdin Transportation Inc and Richard Reyes Tyner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Mangold v. Howland
as 6:2023cv01222
Plaintiff:
Richard Mangold
Defendant:
Donna Howland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Accurso et al v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv00167
Plaintiff:
Jennifer M. Accurso, Mathew M Accurso, George Bolcato and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
