Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Raudez Mejia v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
Vilce Jose Raudez Mejia
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Peterson et al v. Osman et al
as 1:2023cv01029
Plaintiff:
Jeanine Lee Peterson, Margaret Jean Stebbins and Amanda Lynn Peterson
Defendant:
Ahmed Mohamed Osman, Shakta Transportation LLC and United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Cyr v. Rodriguez et al
as 6:2022cv01209
Plaintiff:
Cassidy Cyr
Defendant:
Michael Thomas Rodriguez, Penske Truck Leasing Corporation and United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Eisenlohr v. Carney et al
as 4:2022cv00045
Plaintiff:
Daniel Eisenlohr
Defendant:
Jonathan W Carney and United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Baker v. UPS, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00439
Plaintiff:
John Baker
Defendant:
John Doe, Leo Lane and United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Segura v. United Parcel Service Inc
as 5:2019cv01119
Defendant:
United Parcel Service Inc
Plaintiff:
Cara Marie Segura
Gonzalez v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 2:2019cv02716
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc. and Robert Leon Hunsaker
Plaintiff:
Steve Andrew Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Berrigan et al v. United Parcel Service Inc et al
as 2:2018cv00022
Plaintiff:
James F Berrigan and James F Berrigan (WDR)
Defendant:
United Parcel Service Inc and Michael P Shedd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Still v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 2:2017cv02694
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Still
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pardo v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 2:2017cv02100
Plaintiff:
Francisco Pardo
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
