Labor Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 200
R. et al v. Blue Shield of California We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00502
Plaintiff: R. R. and E. R.
Defendant: Blue Shield of California
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
H. et al v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas et al
as 1:2022cv00092
Plaintiff: M. H. and S. S.
Defendant: Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas, Ericsson and Ericsson Flexible Benefits Plan, The
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
S. v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Illinois
as 2:2022cv00480
Plaintiff: J. S.
Defendant: Blue Cross Blue Shield of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
C. et al v. Automated Benefits Services et al
as 2:2022cv00449
Plaintiff: G. C. and S. C.
Defendant: Automated Benefits Services, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Michigan, Ascension Health Alliance and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
D. et al v. Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield
as 1:2022cv00082
Plaintiff: M. D. and J. D.
Defendant: Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
A. et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas City et al
as 2:2022cv00424
Plaintiff: Jeff A., N. A. and J. A.
Defendant: Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas City and Blueselect Plus
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
F. v. Rocky Mountain Hospital and Medical Service
as 2:2022cv00420
Plaintiff: L. F.
Defendant: Rocky Mountain Hospital and Medical Service doing business as Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
S. et al v. Blue Shield of California et al
as 2:2022cv00382
Plaintiff: Michael S. and M. S.
Defendant: Blue Shield of California, Stanford University Blue Shield Healthcare + Savings Plan, The and Stanford University Blue Shield Healthcare & Savings Plan, The
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
H. v. Healthkeepers We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00368
Plaintiff: A. H.
Defendant: Healthkeepers doing business as Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
K. et al v. Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00370
Plaintiff: J. K. and K. K.
Defendant: Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield, General Dynamics Corporation and General Dynamics Corporation Anthem BCBS Premium HSA and Premium Plus HSA Benefits Plan, The
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?