Cases 41 - 50 of 66
Hong Kong Entertainment (Overseas) Investment, Ltd. et al v. Perez et al
as 1:2014cv00028
Plaintiff:
Hong Kong Entertainment (Overseas) Investment, Ltd. and Man Kwan
Defendant:
Thomas E. Perez, David Weil, Ruben Rosalez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Perez v. Dill
as 1:2014mc00044
Petitioner:
Thomas E. Perez
Respondent:
Walter Dill
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Perez v. Local 1001, Amalgmated Transit Union
as 1:2014cv02286
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Local 1001, Amalgmated Transit Union
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0401
Huffman et al v. American Process Piping, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv02145
Plaintiff:
Shaun Huffman , Henry Perez , William Harding, IV and others
Defendant:
American Process Piping, Inc., Pamela Graves and Charles Smith
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Perez v. Estate of Robert Talley et al
as 1:2014cv01786
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Estate of Richard Talley, The and American Title Services Retirement Trust
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Perez v. Stone Castle et al
as 1:2014cv00066
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Stone Castle and Anthony Stoddard
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Perez et al v. TKC Accent on Elder Care, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00713
Petitioner:
Thomas E. Perez and United States Department of Labor
Respondent:
TKC Accent on Elder Care, Inc. and TKC Silver Rose, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Perez v. CP Restaurant Group, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv00470
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
CP Restaurant Group, LLC, Brexi LLC, DB Bistro LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Perez v. Diamond Kip's, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00468
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Diamond Kip's, Inc. and Timothy A Riggins
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Perez v. Poseidon Dining LLC et al
as 1:2014cv00357
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Poseidon Dining LLC , Ryan Field and Ryan Rezinas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
