Cases 101 - 110 of 110
Stey et al v. Davol et al
as 2:2008cv00355
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Stey and William D. Stey
Defendant:
Davol and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Hamilton v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv02160
Plaintiff:
Gayanne Hamilton
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Ceragenix Pharmaceuticals v. C.R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2008cv00260
Plaintiff:
Ceragenix Pharmaceuticals
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
West v. Davol Inc. et al
as 4:2008cv00143
Plaintiff:
Robert R West and Robert R West
Defendant:
Davol Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Barnsbee v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00438
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Evans Barnsbee
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., Davol, Inc., C.R. Bard, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lassey v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv02082
Plaintiff:
Ruth Anne Lassey, Ruth Anne Lassey, Ruth Anne Lassey and others
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Teller et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00306
Plaintiff:
Donald Teller, II and Carolyn Teller
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Savin et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00307
Plaintiff:
Patricia Savin and Joseph Savin
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Harrington v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 4:2007cv00545
Plaintiff:
Tamara Harrington, Tamara Harrington, Tamara Harrington and others
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Wolfe Tory Medical v. C.R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2007cv00378
Plaintiff:
Wolfe Tory Medical and Wolfe Tory Medical
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
