Cases 11 - 20 of 68
Hosmer et al v. Esquire Bank NA et al
as 1:2018cv00124
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Esquire Bank NA and Citibank N.A.
Plaintiff:
Art Hosmer and Bert Rosenquist
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Legal Tender Services et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 2:2018cv00417
Defendant:
Michael Terrell Best, H Theresa, USAA Federal Savings Bank and others
Plaintiff:
Legal Tender Services and United Precious Metals Association
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
P. et al v. JP Morgan Chase Medical Plan
as 2:2018cv00390
Plaintiff:
Darrin P. , Amber P. and Lily P.
Defendant:
CIGNA Health and Life Insurance Company and JP Morgan Chase Medical Plan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
O. et al v. United Behavioral Health et al
as 1:2018cv00031
Plaintiff:
Graham O. and Linda O.
Defendant:
United Behavioral Health and JP Morgan Group Health Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Windham v. Snyder et al
as 2:2018cv00063
Plaintiff:
Maria E. Windham
Defendant:
Jeffrey Paul Snyder, JP Snyder, Judith J. Snyder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00898
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
JP Ventures v. iVape
as 2:2016cv01212
Plaintiff:
JP Ventures
Defendant:
iVape
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
H. et al v. United Healthcare et al
as 1:2016cv00110
Plaintiff:
John H. , Jenie H. and Nicholas H.
Defendant:
United Healthcare, United Behavioral Health and JP Morgan Chase U.S. Benefits Program
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Hansen et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 2:2016cv00744
Plaintiff:
Rick D. Hansen and Connie D. Hansen
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Chase Bank, JP Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Purdy v. Metlife Home Loans et al
as 1:2016cv00028
Plaintiff:
Homer E. Purdy
Defendant:
Metlife Home Loans, Lundburg & Associates, JP Morgan Chase and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
