Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Pflum v. United States of America Internal Revenue Service
as 5:2008cv04155
Plaintiff:
David Gerard Pflum
Defendant:
United States of America Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
United States of America, Internal Revenue Service v. Lanoie
as 1:2008mc00030
Respondent:
Paul Lanoie, Jr.,
Petitioner:
United States of America, Internal Revenue Service
United States of America, Internal Revenue Service v. Candelaria
as 1:2008mc00022
Petitioner:
United States of America, Internal Revenue Service
Respondent:
Richard Candelaria
United States of America, Internal Revenue Service v. Sutton
as 1:2008mc00014
Plaintiff:
United States of America, Internal Revenue Service
Respondent:
Richard Sutton
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2008cv01054
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
United States of America, Internal Revenue Service v. Williams et al
as 1:2007mc00049
Petitioner:
United States of America, Internal Revenue Service
Respondent:
James C. Williams and Sandi G. Williams
United States of America, Internal Revenue Service v. Williams et al
as 6:2007mc00049
Petitioner:
United States of America, Internal Revenue Service
Respondent:
James C. Williams and Sandi G. Williams
United States of America, Internal Revenue Service v. Rahm et al
as 1:2007mc00038
Petitioner:
United States of America, Internal Revenue Service
Respondent:
Gary Rahm and Rebecca Rahm
United States of America, Internal Revenue Service v. Stoesser
as 1:2007mc00030
Petitioner:
United States of America, Internal Revenue Service
Respondent:
Annette Stoesser
Matteucci Galleries vs. Blakley Trust, et al
as 6:2007cv00407
Plaintiff:
Matteucci Galleries
Defendant:
United States of America, Internal Revenue Service, Lucille Christie Blakey, David Porras and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Action for Interpleader
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
