Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Hipwell v. Air & Liquid Systems et al
as 1:2020cv00063
Defendant:
Trane Techologies, Elliott Company, Warren Pumps and others
Plaintiff:
Marguerite E. Hipwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marriner et al v. CBS Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv00180
Plaintiff:
Sally Marriner and Sally Marriner (Rep)
Defendant:
CBS Corporation, Chevron USA Inc, Cleaver-Brooks Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anderson et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 2:2006cv00741
Defendant:
Utah Power & Light Company, Ford Motor Company, General Motors Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Alexander Anderson, Jr and Arva Anderson
Interested Party:
Copeland Corp and Kaiser Gypsum Company
Not Classified By Court:
Mediator Evelyn J. Furse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WCM Industries, Inc. v. Jay R. Smith Manufacturing Co. et al
as 1:2012cv03019
Plaintiff:
WCM Industries, Inc.
Defendant:
Jay R. Smith Manufacturing Co., MIFAB, Inc., Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Bootenhoff et al v. Hormel Foods Corporation et al
as 5:2011cv01368
Plaintiff:
Norma Bootenhoff and Eugene Bootenhoff
Defendant:
Hormel Foods Corporation , International Paper Company Inc , Meadwestvaco Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marquez Constructors, Inc. v. Zurn Industries, LLC
as 1:2010cv01394
Plaintiff:
Marquez Constructors, Inc.
Defendant:
Zurn Industries, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kolker et al v. Zurn Pex, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00396
Plaintiff:
Anthony C. Kolker, Anthony C. Kolker, Anthony C. Kolker and others
Defendant:
Zurn Pex, Inc. and Zurn Industries, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Coppersmith Plumbing v. Zurn Pex, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00930
Plaintiff:
Coppersmith Plumbing
Defendant:
Zurn Pex, Inc. and Zurn Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
