Cases 51 - 60 of 99
Richard Haka v. USA
as 14-10839
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD K. HAKA
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Nelson Morales v. United States District Court,, et al
as 14-10391
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NELSON MORALES
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA and U.S. ATTORNEY
USA v. Philip Bonadonna
as 13-15147
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
PHILIP ANTHONY BONADONNA
Carlos Zelaya, et al v. USA
as 13-14780
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARLOS ZELAYA, individually and GEORGE GLANTZ, individually and as trustee of the George Glantz Revocable Trust, for themselves and on behalf of all those persons similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Baker County Medical Services, v. U.S. Attorney General, et al
as 13-13917
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BAKER COUNTY MEDICAL SERVICES, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, DIRECTOR OF OFFICE OF DETENTION AND REMOVAL, U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and WILLIAM B. BERGER, SR., United States Marshals Service, Prisoner & Operations Division, Programs and Assistance Branch
USA v. Sila Lui
as 13-13719
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
SILA LUIS
Carlos Urquilla-Diaz v. Kaplan University, et al
as 13-13742
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARLOS URQUILLA-DIAZ
Defendant - Appellee:
KAPLAN UNIVERSITY, KAPLAN HIGHER EDUCATION CORPORATION and KAPLAN, INC.
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jude Gillespie, et al v. Kaplan University, et al
as 13-13672
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUDE GILLESPIE
Defendant - Appellee:
KAPLAN UNIVERSITY, KAPLAN HIGHER EDUCATION CORPORATION and KAPLAN, INC.
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Yaneth Coronell
as 13-12301
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
YANETH MARGARITA CORONELL
USA v. Timothy Hummel
as 13-12115
Movant - Appellant:
TIMOTHY HUMMEL
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
