Cases 21 - 30 of 347
Taser International, Inc. v. Steven Abboud
as 24-10414
Plaintiff:
TASER INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Defendant:
STEVEN ABBOUD
Not Yet Classified:
SERVICE
Noorani Trading Inc. v. Amit Bijani, et al
as 23-13998
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NOORANI TRADING INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
AMIT F BIJANI, NAFISA BIJANI, AB INTERNATIONAL, LLC and others
Rothschild Connected Devices Innovations, LLC v. Coca-Cola Company
as 23-13999
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROTHSCHILD CONNECTED DEVICES INNOVATIONS, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
COCA-COLA COMPANY
Jason Hartman, et al v. Charles Sells, et al
as 23-13473
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JASON HARTMAN, PLATINUM PROPERTIES INVESTOR NETWORK, INC. and THE HARTMAN MEDIA COMPANY, LLC
Defendant / Appellant:
CHARLES SELLS, STEPHANIE PUTICH, YOUNG CHUNG and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Noorani Trading Inc. v. Amit Bijani, et al
as 23-13280
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NOORANI TRADING INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
AMIT F BIJANI, NAFISA BIJANI, AB INTERNATIONAL, LLC and others
Ain Jeem, Inc. v. Carl Puckett, Jr., et al
as 23-13380
Plaintiff / Appellee:
AIN JEEM, INC.
Defendant / Appellant:
CARL ELLEN PUCKETT, JR. and MARCELLA ANDERSON PUCKETT
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Athos Overseas Limited Corp. v. YouTube, Inc., et al
as 23-13156
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ATHOS OVERSEAS LIMITED CORP.
Defendant / Appellee:
YOUTUBE, INC., YOUTUBE, LLC and GOOGLE LLC
Charles Weinacker v. Wahl Clipper Corporation
as 23-12782
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES WEINACKER
Defendant / Appellee:
WAHL CLIPPER CORPORATION
Charles Weinacker v. Petfriendly, Inc., et al
as 23-12901
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES WEINACKER
Defendant / Appellee:
PETFRIENDLY, INC., WWW.PETFRIENDLYDIRECT.COM and PET FRIENDLY DIRECT, LLC
Jekyll Island-State Park Authority v. Polygroup Macau Limited
as 23-11415
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEKYLL ISLAND-STATE PARK AUTHORITY
Defendant / Appellee:
POLYGROUP MACAU LIMITED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
