Cases 31 - 40 of 121
Michael Wappler v. Celestine, et al
as 20-14538
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK INCH, secretary, in individual and official capacity, SANTOS, GLENN MORRIS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL J. WAPPLER
Fiona Robertson-Morris v. Gregory Geopfert, et al
as 20-14240
Defendant / Appellee:
GREGORY GEOPFERT and BOB GUALTIERI
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FIONA ROBERTSON-MORRIS
Curtis Hunter v. Riverbend Correctional Fac., et al
as 20-13432
Defendant / Appellee:
RIVERBEND MEDICAL DEPARTMENT, TAMMY BAILEY, STEVEN NEIGARTH, in his individual and official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CURTIS HUNTER
Larry Morris, Jr. v. Walter McNeil, et al
as 20-12675
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF FLORIDA, LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA and WALTER MCNEIL, Sheriff
Petitioner / Appellant:
LARRY L. MORRIS, JR.
Desmond Griffin v. Morris Rogers, et al
as 20-12617
Defendant / Appellee:
MORRIS L. ROGERS and EDMUNDS AKEEM
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DESMOND GRIFFIN
Morris GreenIn re: Morris Green
as 20-12444
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
In re: MORRIS DEWAYNE GREEN
Geisha Morris-Jacobs v. U.S. Attorney General
as 20-12377
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
GEISHA EMELIA MORRIS-JACOBS
Rayvon Boatman v. Donald Sawyer, et al
as 20-12189
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHNSON, DONALD SAWYER, HERNANDEZ and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAYVON BOATMAN
Curtis Hunter v. Riverbend Correctional, et al
as 20-11910
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT MORRIS, in his/her indiviual and official capacity, RIVERBEND CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and STEVEN NEIGARTH, in his individual and official capacity
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CURTIS HUNTER
James Washington v. Pamela Koller, et al
as 20-11268
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES EDWARD WASHINGTON
Defendant / Appellee:
ALLISON LEIGH MORRIS, in her Official Capacity as Assistant Attorney General and PAMELA J. KOLLER, in her Official Capacity as Assistant Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
