Cases 41 - 50 of 227
Glenda Taylor v. Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Inc. USA, et al
as 21-12619
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GLENDA TAYLOR
Defendant / Appellee:
GLENMARK PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. USA, MARLENE GOLDENBERG, APOTEX CORP. and others
In re: Eugene Taylor
as 21-12319
Petitioner:
In re: EUGENE ELRIDGE TAYLOR
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA
Vinodh Raghubir v. Warden, Taylor Correctional
as 21-11933
Respondent / Appellee:
TAYLOR CI WARDEN
Petitioner / Appellant:
VINODH RAGHUBIR
David Zavala v. Commissioner, Georgia DOC, et al
as 21-11812
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT TOOLE, Director of Field Operations, REGIONAL DIRECTOR TAYLOR, GD&CP/SMU, WARDEN, GD&CP/SMU and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID ZAVALA
David Zavala v. Timothy Ward, et al
as 21-10989
Defendant / Appellee:
RICKY MYRICK, TIMOTHY C. WARD, In his individual and official capacity, ROBERT TOOLE, Director of Field Operations and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID ZAVALA
USA v. Everette Taylor
as 21-11689
Defendant / Appellant:
EVERETTE JAMEL TAYLOR
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Charles Taylor, II v. Governor of Georgia, et al
as 21-11170
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES MYRON TAYLOR, II
Defendant / Appellee:
GOVERNOR OF GEORGIA, WARDEN, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Hakim Muhammad v. Cedric Taylor
as 21-11053
Respondent / Appellee:
CEDRIC TAYLOR
Petitioner / Appellant:
HAKIM MUHAMMAD
Elizabeth Hope v. Austin Taylor
as 21-10736
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ELIZABETH DIANE HOPE, an individual
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Defendant / Appellant:
AUSTIN TAYLOR, individually
Darcy Corbitt, et al v. Hal Taylor, et al
as 21-10486
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DARCY CORBITT, JANE DOE and DESTINY CLARK
Defendant / Appellant:
DEENA PREGNO, in her official capacity as Chief of the Driver License Division, HAL TAYLOR, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Alabama Law Enforcement Agency, CHARLES WARD and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
