Cases 1 - 10 of 199
Walmart, Inc. v. Jean King, et al
as 24-11733
Defendant:
JAMES MCHENRY, in his Official Capacity as Chief Administrative Hearing Officer, SENIOR OFFICIAL PERFORMING THE DUTIES OF DIRECTOR OF THE U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, in his Official Capacity as Senior Official Performing the Duties of Director of the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, in his Official Capacity as U.S. Attorney General and others
Plaintiff:
WALMART, INC.
Joan Davis v. The Office of Bar Admissions, et al
as 23-14236
Plaintiff:
JOAN P. DAVIS
Defendant:
DAVID ERICH NAHMIAS, of the Georgia Supreme Court, in his individual capacity, HEIDI M. FAENZA, Director of Admissions of the Office of Bar Admissions, in her individual capacity and JOHN C. SAMMON, Chairman of the Board to Determine Fitness of Bar Applicants, in his individual capacity
Peter Lynch, et alIn re: Peter Lynch, et al
as 23-13494
Petitioner:
In re: PETER JAMES LYNCH and ALISA MARIE LYNCH
Respondent:
TANISHA BAILEY-ROKA, in her official capacity as Virgin Islands Chief Disciplinary Counsel, and in her Individual Capacity, MICHAEL DAVID HOLZKNECHT, in his former, official capacity as Virgin Islands Special Designated Disciplinary Counsel, and in his Individual Capacity and LEE J. ROHN & ASSOCIATES LLC
Odette Blanco De Fernandez, et al v. Seaboard Marine Ltd.
as 22-12966
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ODETTE BLANCO DE FERNANDEZ, a.k.a. Blanco Rosell, HEBE BLANCO MIYARES, in her personal capacity, and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Byron Blanco Rosell, SERGIO BLANCO DE LA TORRE, in his personal capacity, and as Administrator Ad Litem of the Estate of Enrique Blanco Rosell and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SEABOARD MARINE LTD.
William Lucy v. Gus Thames, Jr., et al
as 21-14243
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM N. LUCY, Personal Representative of Annie D. Fox (Deceased)
Defendant / Appellee:
GUS B. THAMES, JR., in his Personal and Official Capacity d.b.a. Sixety One St. Francis Street Inc. d.b.a. Thames Jackson Harris Co. Realty, MARK ERWIN, Mobile Co. Probate Court Chief Clerk, in his Personal and Official Capacity, FRANK KRUSE, Esq., Mobile County Gen. Administrator,in his Personal and Official Capacity and others
Marida Silas v. Sheriff of Broward County, Florida
as 21-14200
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MARIDA SILAS, Individually, and in her prospective capacity as Personal Representative of the Estate of Rochenel Silas
Defendant / Appellant:
GREGORY TONY, as Sheriff of Broward County, Florida, SHANI KATZ and SHERIFF OF BROWARD COUNTY FLORIDA, as Sheriff of Broward County, Florida
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Sohail Butt v. John Zimmerman, et al
as 21-14187
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SOHAIL N. BUTT
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN BRIGHAM ZIMMERMAN, Georgia Composite Board of Professional Counselors, Social Workers and Marriage and Family Therapists, in his official and individual capacities, TOMMY BLACK, in his individual and official capacity as a board member of Georgia Composite Board of Professional Counselors, Social Workers and Marriage & Family Counselors, ARTHUR WILLIAMS, in his individual and official capacity as a board member of Georgia Composite Board of Professional Counselors, Social Workers and Marriage & Family Counselors and others
Marie Henry v. City of Mount Dora, et al
as 21-14120
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARIE HENRY
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF MOUNT DORA, BRETT LIVINGSTON, In his Official and Individual Capacities, T. RANDALL SCOGGINS, In his Official and Individual Capacities and others
Tammi Taylor v. Pam Palmer
as 21-14070
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TAMMI TAYLOR
Defendant / Appellant:
PAM PALMER, individually and in her official capacity as Mayor of the City of Adamsville
Marida Silas v. Sheriff of Broward County Florida, et al
as 21-13946
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARIDA SILAS, Individually, and in her prospective capacity as Personal Representative of the Estate of Rochenel Silas
Defendant / Appellee:
SHERIFF OF BROWARD COUNTY FLORIDA and SHANI KATZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
