Cases 31 - 38 of 38
Tina Peay v. Mortgage Electronic, et al
as 12-14030
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TINA PEAY
Defendant - Appellee:
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC, MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., MERSCORP, INC. and others
Frederick Staup v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et al
as 12-10835
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK G. STAUP
Defendant - Appellee:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., a Corporation, JANICE VINOKUROW, f.k.a. Janice Lotrey and LAWRENCE LOTREY
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Sammy Richard
as 12-10464
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Successor by Merger to Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc.
Defendant - Appellant:
SAMMY L RICHARDS
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Nadine Hankerson
as 12-10218
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., as Trustee for Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors Trust Mortgage Loan Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2004-OPT1
Defendant - Appellant:
NADINE HANKERSON
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Cynthia Schmid
as 11-15496
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Defendant - Appellant:
CYNTHIA G. SCHMID
Wendy Jenkins, et al v. McCalla Raymer, LLC, et al
as 11-14483
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WENDY N. JENKINS, each Plaintiff individually, and on behalf of all Georgia residents similarly situated and ELEANOR SPRATLIN CRAWFORD
Defendant - Appellee:
MCCALLA RAYMER, LLC, THOMAS A. SEARS, Esq., CHARLES TROY CROUSE, Esq., individually, as an officer of Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc, as an officer of Wells Fargo, and as an employee of McCalla Raymer, a.k.a. C. Troy Crouse and others
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Maryam El-Amin
as 11-14306
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Defendant - Appellant:
MARYAM EL-AMIN
Annette Clark v. Sharpiro and Pickett, et al
as 10-15119
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANNETTE CLARK
Defendant - Appellee:
SHARPIRO AND PICKETT, LLP, EDITH PICKETT and WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., f.k.a. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc., f.k.a. Norwest Mortgage Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
