Cases 71 - 80 of 85
Curtis Howard v. Chase Home Finance, LLC, et al
as 11-13990
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURTIS HOWARD
Defendant - Appellee:
CHASE HOME FINANCE, LLC, MARTIN & BRUNAVS LAW OFFICE and MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEM, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-13330
Plaintiff - Appellant-Cross Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee-Cross Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ellery Steed v. Merscorp Inc., et al
as 11-13100
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELLERY STEED
Defendant - Appellee:
MERSCORP INC., MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS INC., DOES 1-11, INCLUSIVE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-12700
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-11803
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jose Morales v. Chase Home Finance, LLC, et al
as 11-11715
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE MORALES
Defendant - Appellee:
CHASE HOME FINANCE, LLC, MCCALLA RAYMER, LLC, PROMMIS SOLUTIONS, LLC and others
Bosco Kante v. McCurdy & Candler, LLC, et al
as 11-11710
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BOSCO A. KANTE
Defendant - Appellee:
MCCURDY & CANDLER, LLC, U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee for the Certificateholders of Banc of America Funding Trust 2007-7, MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS INC. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-10609
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bosco Kante v. Countrywide Home Loans, et al
as 10-15770
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BOSCO A. KANTE
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, GREENPOINT MORTGAGE FUNDING, INC. and others
Constance Booth v. Aurora Loan Services, LLC, et al
as 10-15712
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CONSTANCE BOOTH, a.k.a. Constance Boothe
Defendant - Appellee:
AURORA LOAN SERVICES, LLC and MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
