Cases 31 - 40 of 174
Daniel v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2019cv00592
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Terry D Daniel and Terry D. Daniel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Amerson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2019cv00682
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Ross D. Amerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Calbetzor v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2019cv00137
Plaintiff:
Jonathan D. Calbetzor
Interested Party:
SSA
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Rivera Diaz v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2019cv00326
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Maria D Rivera Diaz
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2019cv00126
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
John D. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Ward v. Commissioner Social Security
as 3:2018cv01529
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security
Plaintiff:
Alicia D Ward
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427
Haynes v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2018cv02673
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Clef D. Haynes, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Burr v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2018cv00518
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Kenneth D Burr, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Burns v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2018cv01163
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security, Bibiloni, D. Peake and others
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lee Burns
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Alston-Parks v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2018cv00888
Plaintiff:
Sanja D. Alston-Parks
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
