Cases 61 - 70 of 132
Schomaker v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 8:2018cv00358
Plaintiff:
Michael Schomaker
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC v. Mace et al
as 5:2018cv00051
Plaintiff:
Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC
Defendant:
Diana R. Mace, Steven B. Mace, Jennifer Mace and others
Cross_claimant:
Steven B. Mace
Cross_defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Counter_claimant:
Steven B. Mace
Counter_defendant:
Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv00228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. M. Wulff Florida Holdings, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00055
Plaintiff:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
M. Wulff Florida Holdings, Inc. and Mitchell A. Wulff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fournier v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 8:2017cv03042
Plaintiff:
Carmela Fournier
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Gonzalez v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 8:2017cv02908
Plaintiff:
Maricel Gonzalez
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Segarra v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 8:2017cv02801
Plaintiff:
Richard Segarra
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
McArthur v. JP Morgan Chase & Co.
as 6:2017cv01915
Plaintiff:
Reginald McArthur
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Orloski v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 8:2017cv02303
Plaintiff:
Christopher Orloski
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2017cv01860
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
