Cases 41 - 50 of 157
RAND v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv55625
Plaintiff:
CLYDE LEROY RAND
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
REFFITT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv46053
Plaintiff:
BRANTLY COLTON CLYDE REFFITT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HUDGINS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv45200
Plaintiff:
CLYDE HUDGINS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHEREN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv43669
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND CLYDE SHEREN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCKASKLE JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv43231
Plaintiff:
CLYDE W MCKASKLE JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FARMER III v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv41665
Plaintiff:
CLYDE FARMER III
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BUTLER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv38826
Plaintiff:
CLYDE BUTLER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WHITE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv37288
Plaintiff:
CLYDE CONDELL WHITE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARRIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv35957
Plaintiff:
CLYDE HARRIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DRAPERS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv36155
Plaintiff:
CLYDE DRAPERS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
