Cases 21 - 30 of 157
MEADE v. Merck & Co, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv24700
Defendant:
McKesson Corp., Merck & Co, Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Plaintiff:
TAMMY MEADE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robinson v. Merck & Co, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv14467
Defendant:
McKesson Corp., Merck & Co, Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Plaintiff:
Natalie Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Speidel v. Merck & Co, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv14468
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.,, Merck & Co, Inc. and MCKESSON CORP.,
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Speidel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Betty Warner-Williams v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv14469
Defendant:
McKesson Corp., Merck & Co, Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Plaintiff:
Betty Warner-Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCCLOSKEY v. Merck & Co, Inc. et al
as 9:2018cv81542
Defendant:
McKesson Corp., Merck & Co, Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Plaintiff:
KAREN MCCLOSKEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gladney v. Merck & Co, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00753
Defendant:
McKesson Corp., Merck & Co, Inc. and Merck Sharpe & Dohme Corp.
Plaintiff:
Judy Gladney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Linteau v. Merck & Co, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00754
Defendant:
McKesson Corp., Merck & Co, Inc. and Merck Sharp and Dohme Corp.
Plaintiff:
Ruth Linteau
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schuemann v. Merck & Co, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00756
Defendant:
McKesson Corp., Merck & Co, Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Plaintiff:
Garry Schuemann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lane v. Merck & Co, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv01329
Defendant:
McKesson Corp., Merck Sharp and Dohme Corp. and Merck & Co, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Frances Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McDonald v. Merck & Co, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv01330
Defendant:
McKesson Corp., Merck & Co, Inc. and Merck Sharp and Dohme Corp.
Plaintiff:
Richard McDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
