Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Cohen et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv17223
Plaintiff:
Stephen Cohen and Terri Cohen
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
COHEN v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corp. et al
as 3:2023cv10086
Plaintiff:
HARVEY COHEN
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Corp., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
In re: Zantac (Ranitidine) Products Liability Lit.
as 22-12528
Interested Party:
JUDITH COHEN
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Cohen v. Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corp. et al
as 1:2021cv24082
Plaintiff:
Bennett Cohen
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corp., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Promeco, S.A. de C.V. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cohen et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation et al
as 9:2021cv80503
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Glaxosmithkline LLC, Sanofi U.S. Services Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Mai N. Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cohen et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 9:2020cv81753
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelham Pharmaceuticals, Inc., GLAXOSMITH KLINE, LLC, Chattem Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Andrea Cohen and Darin Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COHEN v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv00138
Plaintiff:
LEAH ELYSSA COHEN
Defendant:
OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC, BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY and OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cohen v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 0:2018cv62667
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.,, McKesson Corporation and Merck & Co., Inc.
Plaintiff:
Eleanor Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
