Cases 61 - 70 of 2,681
Grossman v. Oliver et al
as 6:2023cv01804
Plaintiff:
Michael Grossman
Defendant:
Charles Oliver and American Equity Advisory Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Wonsey
as 8:2023cv02174
Plaintiff:
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Defendant:
Patrick Wonsey doing business as One Bell & Associates, Inc.
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Cuesta
as 0:2023cv61817
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Christian A. Cuesta
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078 Securities Exchange Act
Mineworker's Pension Scheme, et al v. Citrix Systems, Inc., et al
as 23-12942
Interested Party:
MINEWORKER'S PENSION SCHEME and BRITISH COAL STAFF SUPERANNUATION SCHEME
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION FUND
Defendant / Appellee:
CITRIX SYSTEMS, INC., DAVID HENSHALL, ROBERT M. CALDERONI and others
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Dean Vagnozzi
as 23-13027
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant / Appellant:
DEAN J. VAGNOZZI
Interested Party:
RYAN K. STUMPHAUZER
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Paulo De Bastos
as 23-12900
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant / Appellant:
PAULO FERNANDO DE BASTOS and PAULO DE BASTOS
Securities and Exchange Commission v. RONDINI, III et al
as 9:2023cv81285
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
WILSON J. RONDINI, III, Falcon Capital LLP and Falcon Capital Partners Limited
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078 Securities Exchange Act
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Prager Metis CPAs, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv23723
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Prager Metis CPAs, LLC and Prager Metis CPAs LLP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078 Securities Exchange Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2020cv81205
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consolidated Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0077 Securities Fraud
Lambo v. Ardman et al
as 3:2023cv01153
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lambo
Defendant:
Neal Ardman and NIA Broadcasting, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0077 Securities Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
