Cases 1 - 10 of 62
Rodriguez v. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00651
Plaintiff:
Dennisse Lydia Rodriguez
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Smith v. O'Malley
as 8:2024cv01515
Plaintiff:
April Smith
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Gantt v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv22331
Plaintiff:
Dakisha Gantt
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
v. Esquijerosa et al
as 3:2024cv00620
Defendant:
Gilberto Esquijerosa and Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
SKONIECZNY v. O'MALLEY
as 3:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
JAMES JUSTIN SKONIECZNY
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Chinchilla v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00295
Plaintiff:
Dalia Chinchilla
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Green v. O'Malley
as 8:2024cv01424
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Green
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Espinal Velez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 0:2024cv60966
Plaintiff:
Johanna Espinal Velez
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Vaccarino v. O'Malley
as 8:2024cv01379
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Vaccarino
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
DESHIELDS v. O'MALLEY
as 5:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
DAVIS ALAN DESHIELDS
Defendant:
MARTIN J O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
