Cases 81 - 90 of 234
Malibu Media, LLC v. John Does 1-29
as 2:2012cv00558
Plaintiff:
Malibu Media, LLC
Defendant:
John Does 1-29
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Malibu Media, LLC v. Does 1-72
as 8:2012cv02301
Plaintiff:
Malibu Media, LLC
Defendant:
John Does 1-72
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Malibu Media, LLC v. John Does 1-27
as 3:2012cv01100
Plaintiff:
Malibu Media, LLC
Defendant:
John Does 1-27
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc. v. Lynch et al
as 2:2012cv00542
Plaintiff:
Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc.
Defendant:
James Michael Lynch, Unknown Websites 1-10, John Does #1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
THIRD DEGREE FILMS INC v. JOHN DOES 1-63
as 4:2012cv00498
Plaintiff:
THIRD DEGREE FILMS INC
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-63
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Patrick Collins, Inc. v. Does 1-43
as 2:2012cv00521
Plaintiff:
Patrick Collins, Inc.
Defendant:
John Does 1-43
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Third Degree Films, Inc. v. Does 1-70
as 2:2012cv00522
Plaintiff:
Third Degree Films, Inc.
Defendant:
John Does 1-70
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Eddy v. Match.com, L.L.C. et al
as 1:2012cv23153
Plaintiff:
Liz Eddy
Defendant:
Match.com, L.L.C., Citizenhawk, Inc and John Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
HAREL et al v. KGM INDUSTRIES CO., INC. et al
as 0:2012cv61669
Plaintiff:
YIGAL COHEN HAREL and INTEGRAL LOGISTICS, LLC
Defendant:
KGM INDUSTRIES CO., INC., JOHN DOES 1-10 and XYZ CORPORATIONS 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
VMR Products, LLC v. Electronic Cigarettes Outlet, LLC et al
as 1:2012cv23092
Plaintiff:
VMR Products, LLC
Defendant:
Electronic Cigarettes Outlet, LLC, Electronic Cigarette.Com, Inc., Yaron Maman and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
