Cases 11 - 20 of 1,286
In re: Johnny Carter
as 23-13839
Petitioner:
In re: JOHNNY CARTER
Respondent:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA and DISTRICT COURT
Eddie MoultrieIn re: Eddie Moultrie
as 23-13686
Petitioner:
In re: EDDIE JAMES MOULTRIE
Respondent:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
In re: Matthew Phillips
as 23-13163
Petitioner:
In re: MATTHEW SHERMAN PHILLIPS
Respondent:
GOVERNOR OF ALABAMA, COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WARDEN and others
In re: Thomas Brown, IV
as 23-13104
Petitioner:
In re: THOMAS EVERITT BROWN, IV
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, SECRETARY FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Jason TiszaiIn re: Jason Tiszai
as 23-13077
Petitioner:
In re: JASON ALLEN TISZAI
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Inestin Petit-HommeIn re: Inestin Petit-Homme
as 23-13053
Petitioner:
In re: INESTIN PETIT-HOMME
Respondent:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF FLORIDA
Donald Whatley v. Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections
as 23-12863
Petitioner / Appellant:
DONALD DWAYNE WHATLEY
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
In re: Rontarian Wright
as 23-12516
Petitioner:
In re: RONTARIAN LAMAR WRIGHT
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PATRICIA SISTRUNK, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Christopher Lowry-RojasIn re: Christopher Lowry-Rojas
as 23-12183
Petitioner:
In re: CHRISTOPHER LOWRY-ROJAS
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
In re: Charlene Walker Rosa
as 23-12123
Petitioner:
In re: CHARLENE TERRY-ANN WALKER ROSA
Respondent:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF FLORIDA and FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
