Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Ghaly v Secretary, Deparment of Homeland Security et al
as 6:2008cv00254
Plaintiff:
Samy G. Ghaly
Defendant:
Secretary Department of Homeland Security, Director, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and US Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Khan v. US Attorney General et al
as 1:2007cv23142
Plaintiff:
Muhammad M. Khan
Defendant:
US Attorney General, US Attorney General, Secretary of The Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Leonides v. Sec. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 6:2007cv01345
Petitioner:
Cesar Leonides
Respondent:
Sec. Department of Homeland Security, US Attorney General and Michael Rozos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Shekha v. US Attorney General et al
as 1:2007cv21927
Plaintiff:
Shabeer Shekha
Defendant:
US Attorney General, Secretary of The Department of Homeland Security, US Citizenship & Immigration Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Zaczac v. US Attorney General et al
as 1:2007cv21295
Plaintiff:
Georgi Zaczac
Defendant:
US Attorney General, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, Director of the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Malakhov v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 1:2007cv20959
Plaintiff:
Vladimir Malakhov
Defendant:
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, US Attorney General, Homeland Security Secretary and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Mahadeo-Faisal v. US Attorney General et al
as 6:2007cv00587
Plaintiff:
Narita Devi Mahadeo-Faisal and Mohammad Faisal
Defendant:
US Attorney General, Sec. Department of Homeland Security, Emilio T. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
