Cases 21 - 30 of 83
Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection v. Timemark Solutions Inc. et al
as 9:2020cv81055
Defendant:
Timemark Solutions Inc., Timothy Lenihan, Sr., Mark Nagler and others
Plaintiff:
Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection v. Timemark Solutions Inc. et al
as 9:2020cv81057
Defendant:
Timemark Solutions Inc., Timothy Lenihan, Sr., Mark Nagler and others
Plaintiff:
Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mary Bradley, et al v. Casey Benton
as 20-11509
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MARY JO BRADLEY, G. B., J. B. and others
Defendant / Appellant:
CASEY BENTON
In re: Brian Casey
as 20-10892
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
In re: BRIAN M. CASEY
Brian Casey v. Secretary, Department of Corr., et al
as 20-10061
Defendant / Appellee:
Z. CULPEPPER, Secretary, Department of Corrections Representative, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, A. RALPH, Assistant Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRIAN M. CASEY
Casey Luczak v. David Farnham, et al
as 19-14754
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CASEY LUCZAK
Defendant / Appellee:
THE FARNHAM LAW FIRM and DAVID J. FARNHAM, Georgia Bar Number: 255410
Tiger et al v. Gator's Dockside Group, Inc., et al.
as 6:2019cv01935
Defendant:
Gator's Dockside Group, Inc., PosIQ, Inc., Gator's Dockside of Ocoee, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Tiger and Casey Fitzgerald
Brian Casey v. Federal Public Defender
as 19-12379
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRIAN M. CASEY
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER
Casey v. Paramount Residential Mortgage Group, Inc.
as 1:2019cv22473
Defendant:
Paramount Residential Mortgage Group, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sean Casey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brian Casey v. Donna Elm, et al
as 19-12220
Defendant / Appellee:
TAMARA E. THEISS and DONNA LEE ELM
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRIAN M. CASEY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
